Tuesday, December 17, 2019

China’s top bankers who “disappeared,” were detained, or died unnaturally in the past year

This article was originally published on Dec. 11, 2015 and updated on Jan. 28, 2016.
One of China’s top bankers and a former regulator fell to his death yesterday (Jan. 27) morning, and left behind a suicide note, after being put under investigation by the Communist Party’s discipline watchdog for possible corruption.
Yang Zezhu, 62, former chairman of Changjiang Securities, had resigned from his post after the mid-sized Chinese brokerage said on Jan. 6 that he was being probed by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection for “personal reasons.”
Yang is just the latest in a long list of Chinese bankers and finance heads that have unnaturally died, been suspended from their jobs, or “disappeared,” after President Xi Jinping’s sweeping anti-graft campaign spread to the financial sector in the past year. Since China’s stock market crash that vaporized nearly $5 trillion between last June and August, China’s authorities have been ruthlessly looking for culprits guilty of insider trading, rumor-spreading, and what they called ”malicious” short-selling.
The culprits (or scapegoats, some argue) include top executives at some of China’s largest banks, brokers, and hedge funds—a comprehensive round-up that would be almost unfathomable in any other country. Imagine, for example, if in the past year US authorities had detained or “disappeared” Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan, Goldman Sachs’s Lloyd Blankfein and several of his top executives, Charles Schwab’s Walter W. Bettinger, Wells Fargo’s John Stumpf, Third Point’s Dan Loeb, and Warren Buffet—as well as several others.
Here’s a list of China’s top bankers and fund managers who have been detained, disappeared, or died of unnatural causes in the past year. In some cases, their company says they are still “unreachable” and they have not been seen in public since their disappearance:
Mao Xiaofeng, president, China Minsheng Bank
REUTERS/STRINGER
Mao Xiaofeng, president of Minsheng Bank.
Mao, 43, the youngest president of a listed Chinese bank, was taken away by the Communist Party’s anti-graft agency in January of 2015 to assist with the probe into Ling Jihua, the one-time top aide of former president Hu Jintao. Minsheng Bank said Mao had resigned for “personal reasons” after Chinese media reported the investigation.
Minsheng, the world’s 49th largest bank, is known for its fast loan growth. Before joining Minsheng in 2002, Mao served in mid-level leadership roles in the Communist Youth League, a key power base of Hu Jintao. Chinese media reported Mao had links to wives of fallen state leaders—he had paved the way for Lin’s wife to work at a bank subsidiary for three years.
Lei Jie, chairman, Founder Securities
After going missing in January 2015, Lei Jie, chairman of Founder Securities and its joint venture with Credit Suisse Group, was released from police custody a few months ago, according to Bloomberg.
Wang Yaoting, vice president, Hua Xia Bank
Wang, a deputy chief of the mid-sized Shanghai-listed lender, was taken away in May 2015 for a corruption investigation. Wang was taken to court (link in Chinese) in December and charged with $164,000 in bribe-taking.
Li Yifei, chairwoman, Man Group’s China business
REUTERS/STRINGER
Li Yifei, chairwoman of Man Group Plc’s China business.
Li, head of the China unit of London-based Man Group, the world’s largest publicly traded hedge fund, was taken into police custody to assist with an investigation into market volatility, Bloomberg reported in August 2015. Li showed up in November at a Beijing charity forum, denying she has been investigated (link in Chinese). Li said she was on a vacation in China when the news of her disappearance came out, but her husband told Bloomberg earlier she was meeting with unidentified “relevant industry authorities.”
Citic Securities president Cheng Boming and other top executives
REUTERS/STRINGER
Cheng Boming, president of CITIC Securities.
Cheng, chief of China’s biggest broker,was probed by police for suspected insider trading in September 2015. In August, managing directors Xu Gang and Liu Wei admitted to illegal trading, after a total of eight Citic staff members were rounded up for the offense.
Citic was a major player in China’s “national team”—a group of state-backed financial institutions dragooned to buy Chinese stocks to prop up the market. On Dec. 6, 2015 Jun Chen and Jianlin Yan, two senior executives with Citic Securities, were also detained in an unspecified investigation.
Zhao Dajian, honorary chairman, Minzu Securities
Zhao, who is also a director of parent Founder Securities, has been missing since Sept. 22, 2015 after Chinese media reported (link in Chinese) he was taken away by police for an unspecified investigation.
Chen Hongqiao, president, Guosen Securities
Chen, 49, president of China’s fifth biggest broker, hanged himself in his Shenzhen home in October of 2015. Before joining Guosen in 2014, Chen was a senior stock market regulator at the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. He was a deputy of Zhang Yujun—the former assistant chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, who was taken away for investigation in September—when Zhang served as general manager of the Shenzhen bourse.
Xu Xiang, general manager, Zexi Investment
Xu, nicknamed “hedge fund brother No. 1,” was detained by police for alleged insider trading and stock manipulation in November of 2015. Despite the stock market meltdown, Xu yielded an average of 249% returns over the five funds he managed in the first ten months of 2015. The average return of Zexi’s funds has ranked him in China’s top three fund managers every year since the company was founded in 2010.
Yim Fung, chairman, Guotai Junan International
AP/APPLE DAILY
Yim Fung, chairman and chief executive of Guotai Junan International.
Yim, chairman of the Hong Kong unit of Guotai Junan Securities, one of China’s largest brokers, was out of contact for more than a month after disappearing on Nov. 18, 2015. Chinese media reported Yim was taken away as part of an investigation into Yao Gang, a vice chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission who used to be a general manager at Guotai Junan Securities. He reappeared in late December, after “assisting in certain investigations.”
Zhang Yun, president, Agricultural Bank of China
REUTERS/TYRONE SIU
Zhang Yun, president of Agricultural Bank of China.
Zhang, president of China’s third largest bank, resigned from all his posts at AgBank in December after he was taken away for an unspecified anti-graft investigation in November. Earlier Zhang had been named by Yang Kun, former vice president of AgBank, when he was sentenced to a lifetime in jail (link in Chinese) for taking bribes in 2013. Zhang had served in AgBank for 30 years before he became the president in 2009.
Guo Guangzhang, chairman of the Fosun Group
Guo, 48, the billionaire chairman of the Chinese conglomerate Fosun Group, disappeared from the public eye for several days last December as he was “assisting in certain investigations” by the Chinese authorities, the group’s Shanghai-listed subsidiaries said. Four days after his disappearance, Guo reappeared at his group’s annual meeting in Shanghai on Dec. 14. It is not clear what investigation he was linked to.
Guo ranks 17th among China’s richest men with a net worth of $5.6 billion. He nicknamed himself “China’s Warren Buffet,” and copied Berkshire Hathaway’s business model, investing float from insurance premiums in Fosun’s other business—real estate, pharmaceutical and commodities. Assets in the insurance business, at 113 billion yuan ($17.6 billion), account for 35% of the group’s total assets. Fosun announced 16 overseas deals worth a combined $4.5 billion last year, according to Bloomberg.
Yang Zezhu, chairman, Changjiang Securities
On the morning of Jan. 27, Yang fell to his death from his 12th floor apartment in Wuhan, capital of the central Hubei province, where the brokerage is based. A suicide note was found by police.
Before joining Changjiang in 2013, Yang headed the Hubei provincial branch of the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, which oversees government conglomerates, for seven years. Chinese media report the investigation into Yang is related to his days at the Hubei regulator. Yang and his son were reported by several companies for fraud worth $HK80 million (around $10 million) in 2013, financial newspaper China Business News reported (link in Chinese).
May Shi contributed reporting to this article.

Whistleblower Alleges $100 Billion Stockpile By Mormon Church


NEW YORK — A whistleblower complaint filed at the Internal Revenue Service in November by a knowledgeable church member alleges that a non-profit supporting organization controlled by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints used member tithes to amass more than $100 billion in a set of investment funds and the Church misled members about uses of the money.
The complaint may be the most important look at LDS finances in decades, a window into one of the wealthiest religious organizations in the United States and the world. Details of the IRS filing reveal financial assets largely hidden from the church’s membership (often known as “Mormons”) and the public view. 
The 74-page document filed with the IRS and obtained by Religion Unplugged shows that Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc. (EPA) owned assets under management grew to more than $100 billion from $10 billion in the past 22 years, fueled by a mix of investment strategy and tithe money from church members. 
Religion Unplugged reached EPA’s managing director Roger Clark by phone on Monday, offering to explain key parts of this story and to ask questions for EPA to give a response. “We don’t really answer questions with the public press. So thanks,” he said, before hanging up the phone.  
Ensign Peak Advisors' articles of incorporation confirm Ensign Peak is an arm of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. As registered under section 509(a)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, Ensign Peak Advisors, Inc.  EPA is a “supporting organization” of the Church under article 3 in its registration document. Upon dissolution, all Ensign Peak assets go the Church or affiliated organizations according to article 5 and that article cannot be changed without “the written consent of The First Presidency” of the Church. Because Ensign Peak Advisers is a support organization to a church it is not subject to disclosure requirements that other non-profit organizations are required to make.  
A former Church member in Minnesota named Lars Nielsen published a 74-page document filed with the IRS that makes several allegations. The filing also included several internal EPA documents including an EPA Policy book, an EPA master plan, an EPA New Staff Orientation Guide, statements of financial condition and data downloads and analysis of the firm’s investment portfolio. One presentation slide in the document from March of 2013 is labeled “New Staff Orientation Deck” and shows a Church investment governance structure including a “Council on Disposition of Tithes” that allocates funds from tithes to holding organizations in the church such as EPA.  
Nielsen learned of the allegations from an LDS church member, who prefers to be unnamed. The whistleblower worked with Nielsen on a two-month research project to research and explain the inner workings of EPA. The complaint (Form 211) was filed with the IRS whistleblower office on Nov. 15, 2019 and received by the IRS on Nov. 22, 2019. Nielsen has chosen to go public with the allegations by releasing the report online and explaining the allegations in videos.
“I started to suspect that EPA was not compliant with its 501c3 or acting in accordance with its Articles of Incorporation around 2013,” the whistleblower writes on a notarized cover letter to the IRS obtained by Religion Unplugged. “I raised several flags and concerns over the years.” 

A SECRET $100 BILLION STOCKPILE

The document tallies assets in EPA using downloaded spreadsheets of assets from across its portfolio from March 22, 2018. The document indicates that the firm receives billions each year from tithe revenue - the donations church members make to the church - and estimates EPA assets from tithes and investment growth is more than $100 billion at present. 
The organization’s IRS 990-t forms also show an opaque but growing organization. In 2007, the organization listed “investing” as its primary business activity, lists a $1 million book value of all assets at year end. In 2015, it listed a book value “over” $1 million. By 2017, EPA listed “investing in partnerships” as its primary business, did not disclose its book value, reported $17.6 million in capital gain net income and lists $1.25 million as tax overpayment. Meanwhile, a letter on EPA stationery from Jan. 9, 2017, signed by vice president Greg Tarbet offered credit information about the firm saying, “Ensign Peak does not distribute financial statements. Assets, however, are well in excess of $5 billion, and Ensign Peak is essentially without debt.” 
An internal EPA slide presentation from 2013 states that during the financial crisis period of 2008 and 2009, the firm “experienced a temporary drawdown” of close to $13 billion, noting that amount was greater than 30 percent of its portfolio at the time. 
The whistleblower complaint said EPA had 75 employees in 2019, up from 20 in 2010. They work in a building in Salt Lake City, Utah, (60 East South Temple, Suite 400) that does not have a sign on the building or in the downstairs lobby according to the complaint. The company does not have a public web site. A LinkedIn search of Ensign Peak Advisors lists 64 people who work there including people in typical finance roles such as compliance officer, investment manager, investment analyst, portfolio manager, equity trader, private equity associate and accountant. 
“Supporting organizations raise funds. They invest funds. Depending on how the investment fund was set up, it could well be proper,” says Arthur Rieman, an attorney at The Law Firm for Non-Profits in Studio City, Calif. “If it’s set up as an investment fund and increased 1,000 percent in 20 years, that’s a pretty good return.” 
The whistleblower document alleges that EPA has given away $0 to religious, educational or charitable purposes. Non-profit experts such as Rieman note that EPAs registration as a 509(a)3 supporting organization to the LDS Church could protect it from having to make charitable distributions because churches are not required to disclose finances to the public. 
“The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints pays all taxes that are required by law,” says an LDS Church statement about its tax status. 
Nielsen says the Mormon “giga-church” needs “a place to park its cash” and has used EPA to do so. Nielsen alleges EPA grew from regular tithes by members of the LDS Church, most of whom had no idea of how their money was being spent or invested given the lack of public financial disclosure by the church since 1959. 
Certainly, other religions and denominations - Islam, Hinduism, Judaism, Catholicism, Episcopalians, Orthodox Christians and protestants - have property and wealth. Calculating that wealth is often difficult because of varied organization structures. For example, Catholic News Service reported in June that the Institute for the Works of Religion - often referred to the Vatican bank - held assets worth $5.6 billion at the end of 2018. But that does not capture the vast real estate and financial profile of the Roman Catholic Church and its thousands of dioceses around the world according to experts who spoke with TheStreet.com in 2015

HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE

If true as the whistleblower alleges, the size of the LDS Church holdings at EPA would represent a massive pool of capital of interest to the financial world, which pays close attention to the investment moves of large pension funds and major university endowments. 
Religion Unplugged called the media relations office of the LDS Church on Monday and sent several questions by email. Church spokesman Eric D. Hawkins responded by email saying, “the Church does not provide information about specific transactions or financial decisions.” He sent language from the church’s web site such as its “Principles of Church Finances” section that includes, “Following sound financial principles over an extended period of time, the Church has grown from meager beginnings into a worldwide organization able to support its divine mission.”
Exhibits in the whistleblower complaint include internal documents, a masterplan and presentation slides from EPA where it describes the purposes of its reserves to support prophetic initiatives, church operating budgets, backstops to pension plans and collateral for church purposes. 
“The corporation’s property is irrevocably dedicated to religious, educational and charitable purposes meeting the requirements for exemption provided by Section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code, and no part of the net income or assets of this corporation shall ever inure to the benefit of any trustee, officer or member thereof or to the benefit of any private person,” says one provision of the Articles of Incorporation.
The filing to the IRS alleges that EPA has made zero religious, educational or charitable distributions in 22 years. According to tax experts, that may not be a problem for a 509(a)3 organization, depending on more nuanced details of its registration which are not publicly available on the IRS web site or the organizations 990-t annual filings. 
“EPA is the reserve of the reserves,” a whistleblower is quoted as saying in the document. It suggests tithing surplus flows to EPA where it is “merged, sliced and diced into portfolios and limited liability companies designed to fly under radars and reporting limits.” The document obtained by Religion Unplugged makes several additional allegations about EPA.

CITY CREEK CENTER MALL 

The complaint alleges a series of payments from EPA totaling $1.4 billion to help construct the City Creek Center mall in Temple Square in downtown Salt Lake City, Utah, which features a retractable roof, luxury storefronts and simulated creek with live trout. The LDS Church and its developers aimed to create a new urbanism in downtown Salt Lake City. 
The mall was developed by Property Reserve, Inc., which is a commercial real estate division of the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and retail manager Taubman Centers Inc. according to a press release from the LDS Church on Oct. 3, 2006. These entities developed the mall during the financial crisis, which caused funding difficulties. The church and developers have not disclosed the entire cost of the mall according to an article in The New York Times on July 9, 2013.
The whistleblower complaint pointed to the LDS church-owned Ensign Magazine in 2006 that said “no tithing funds will be used in the redevelopment” of the area downtown. A year later, in 2007, the church-owned newspaper, The Deseret News, reported that “Money for the project is not coming from the LDS Church members’ tithing donations. City Creek Center is being developed by Property Reserve Inc., the church’s real-estate development arm, and its money comes from other real-estate ventures.” And local TV station KUTV on Oct. 3, 2006, also reported Presiding Bishop of the church H. David Burton saying no tax dollars or tithes will be used in construction.
The whistleblower complaint alleges that $1.4 billion of funding from EPA did go toward the mall project and came from a funding pool that included tithing dollars. A slide from an EPA internal presentation dated March 2013 and titled “Framework and Exposures” indicates $1.4 million was paid to the City Creek project over five years. 
The mall opened in 2012 with 100 stores in more than 700,000 square feet of retail space and is part of downtown Salt Lake City revitalization plans that includes office space and residential towers. “No one will mistake it for the East Village, but downtown is starting to become a place people actually seek out to eat and play,” said Jason Mathis of the Downtown Alliance to the Times article in 2013.  
The City Creek Mall rose as a competitor to another similar-sized downtown retailer called Gateway mall, which opened in 2001 by The Boyer Co. ahead of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and was later sold to Illinois-based Retail Properties of America Inc. The Salt Lake Tribune reported on Jan. 16, 2015, that Gateway saw its credit status, retailer occupancy and retail sales decline after City Creek opened. 
New York-based Moody’s Investors Service noted that Gateway’s occupancy rate dropped from 96 percent in 2010 to 78 percent in 2015 as an Apple Store and others decamped from Gateway to City Creek. Moody’s noted the mall’s reported value dropped from $163 million in 2010 to $75 million in 2014. The Tribune reported Gateway’s annual sales fell from $210 million in 2011 $100 million in 2013, citing data from the Utah Tax Commission. At the same time, City Creek’s revenues grew from zero to $250 million. Local news outlets reported that Gateway Mall became a “ghost town” and saw an “uptick in crime, drug and homeless activity.” It was sold to a new owner, Vestar, in 2016 which reportedly invested $100 million into the property. 
One member of the Corporation of the Presiding Bishopric and an executive in the LDS for-profit businesses, Keith McMullin, told Bloomberg BusinessWeek in 2012 that tithes do not go to the church’s for-profit endeavors and did not go to City Creek Center. 
The whistleblower complaint to the IRS raises the question of whether church leaders such as McMullin made honest or false public statements about financing sources for the mall project both before and after construction of the mall. 
When asked about tithe funds being used in the City Creek project contradicting what the church leaders said, LDS Church spokesman Eric D. Hawkins sent language from a church statement that said the City Creek development is a way “the Church enhanced the environs of Temple Square and underscored a commitment to Salt Lake City, Utah, where it is headquartered.” 

MORMON INC.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is one of the most economically successful religious organizations in the United States, defying a history of persecution. Mormons settled in Utah after they were attacked by mobs at times during their nearly 200-year history and forced to flee previous locations in upstate New York, Ohio, Missouri and Illinois. 
LDS members in the resulting nearly two centuries have founded companies, become elected to federal offices and written best-selling books. And, in the early days, LDS Church leaders set up hundreds of businesses in Utah to help build a functioning economy. Early efforts to force church members to patronize LDS-owned businesses led to the U.S. Congress passing the Edmunds-Tucker Act in 1887 to limit vertical integration and monopolies by the LDS Church. 
The President of the LDS Church, currently Russell M. Nelson, presides over 18,000 churches, 217 temples, four universities, three media companies and dozens of other properties along with EPA. 
Pew Research Center data shows 97 percent of LDS members consider themselves Christian but only 51 percent of U.S. adults consider Mormonism as a Christian religion. Pew data also shows that LDS members are more highly involved in their congregations than any sector of Christianity, surpassing Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox Christians alike. In the book “Passing the Plate,” Christian Smith writes that most Christians give away 2 percent or less of their income while Mormons averaged 5.2%. 
TIME Magazine published a cover story (“Mormons Inc.”) expose by David Van Biema in 1997 titled “Kingdom Come” that showed the growing financial power of the LDS church. It said “Salt Lake City was just for starters – The Mormons’ true great trek has been to social acceptance and a $30 billion church empire.” The story examined the extensive agricultural holdings, radio station chains, life insurance companies and other assets.  “There is no major church in the U.S. as active as the Latter-day Saints in economic life, nor, per capita, as successful at it.” The piece argued that Roman Catholics have more wealth than Mormons but the Catholic Church had 45 times as many members in 1997.
“The Mormon Church is by far the most numerically successful creed born on American soil and one of the fastest growing anywhere,” Van Biema and colleagues wrote. “Its U.S. membership of 4.8 million is the seventh largest in the country, while its hefty 4.7% annual American growth rate is nearly doubled abroad, where there are already 4.9 million adherents.” 
Now, 22 years later, the church is up to 16.3 million members by Dec. 31, 2018, according to its communication and public relations department. The report states 102,102 new births in 2018 and 234,332 new converts to the church which reports 65,000 full-time missionaries around the world. Meanwhile, some Utah news outlets and researchers suggest church membership growth is sputtering.
Newsweek published a story on June 5, 2011, by novelist Walter Kirn titled “The Mormon Moment” noting that the LDS Church, “resembles a sanctified multinational corporation – the General Electric of American religion, with global ambitions and an estimated net worth of $30 billion.” It noted that then presidential candidate Mitt Romney was a wealthy and powerful member of the Mormon church as was fellow presidential candidate Jon Huntsman Jr. Senate majority leader Harry Reid was Mormon at the time as well.
Bloomberg News estimated the net worth of LDS church assets at around $40 billion in 2012. The whistleblower estimates a closer net-worth figure of the church could be $200 billion or more when you include EPA along with vast agricultural and property holdings.
A church-managed investment portfolio represents a newer area for the church. When asked to confirm or deny the whistleblower allegation that the Church has amassed more than $100 billion in owned assets under management, the LDS Church spokesman pointed again to online statements from the church such as: 
“The Church’s reserves are overseen by Church leaders and managed by professional advisers, consistent with wise and prudent stewardship and modern investment management principles. Ultimately, all funds earned by the Church’s investments go back to supporting its mission to invite souls to come unto Christ."

TITHING CULTURE

The Church’s auditing department publishes a short statement every year without giving more financial disclosure. “Church Auditing is of the opinion that, in all material respects, contributions received, expenditures made, and assets of the Church for the year 2017 have been recorded and administered in accordance with approved Church budgets, policies, and accounting practices. The Church follows the practices taught to its members of living within a budget, avoiding debt, and saving against a time of need,” said the statement for 2017, read aloud every April in the Saturday afternoon session of its General Conference. 
Author Jana Riess wrote a piece at Religion News Service in December of 2019 titled, “I just paid my Mormon tithing. Why don’t I feel better about it?” She notes that December is a time when Mormons are supposed to sit down with their bishops to “declare” themselves. That means “Are you a full tithe-payer (10%), a partial tithe-payer (something less than 10%) or a non-tithe payer?” 
Riess noted that the LDS church stopped making disclosures to its members about its use of money in 1959 because the church “was on the brink of financial disaster” that year. She suspects the non-disclosure policy continues “not because the church is poor or indebted, but because it has grown wealthy enough that exposing the extent of its holdings could cause embarrassment and prompt unwanted questions.”  
Samuel D. Brunson, the Georgia Reithal Professor of Law at Loyola University in Chicago, writes that this practice dates back to at least 1906 and, today, “provides the sole window into the global finances of the LDS Church.” In the Spring 2015 issue of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, Brunson wrote an article on “LDS Financial Transparency” that shows finances were once “open for the inspection of the Saints” according to church records from 1905 and 1906. Brunson writes the Church was more financially accountable to its members between 1915 and 1959. He writes that the LDS Church lost $1 million on municipal bonds in 1956 and spent $8 million more than its income during 1959. 
 “As a result of its silence about the details of its finances, members, critics, and the interested public have been left to guess at the Church’s wealth and the scope of its charitable spending, among other things,” Brunson writes. “The Church’s lack of public financial disclosure bothers some—apologists and critics alike—who have requested, in various ways, that the Church return to its former practice of publicly disclosing detailed financial information.” 
Brunson told TheStreet.com that England and Canada have disclosure requirements for religious non-profits but that churches in the U.S. can “disclose whatever they want” and “whatever they want can vary.” 
Experts on the LDS Church note that in Mormonism, the church hierarchy uses tithing as a principal metric to judge the faithfulness of its members. Only tithing members can witness temple marriages of other members, including one’s children and participate in other central rites of the faith. Only “tithing faithful” males can move up in rank of church leadership according to Richard Ostling, a ReligionUnplugged columnist who co-authored the 2007 book “Mormon America: The Power and the Promise.”
Aaron L. West wrote in Ensign Magazine in 2012 quoting a Mormon bishop in El Salvador who said, “If paying tithing means that you can’t pay for water or electricity, pay tithing. If paying tithing means that you can’t pay your rent, pay tithing. Even if paying tithing means that you don’t have enough money to feed your family, pay tithing.” (The church’s Ensign Magazine and the EPA fund take their name from Isaiah 5:26 that says, “He will lift up an ensign to the nations.”) 
TIME reported in 1997 that $5.2 billion flowed into the LDS Church in 1996, dwarfing the pace of contributions received by other denominations. It noted that the LDS Church sees tithes not just as tools for paying church staff and expenses but, rather, as venture capital to build new temples (normal activity for religious organizations) and also to invest in stocks and bonds as well as for-profit companies in agriculture, travel and real estate. TIME estimated LDS Church investments to be $6 billion in 1997, a figure that may have been under-reported. 
By comparison, the Southern Baptist Convention, the largest protestant denomination in the U.S., discloses on its web site that it received $9.6 billion in giving from the estimated 14.8 million members in its 47,456 cooperating churches in 2017-2018. 
Brunson notes that some other churches are trying to improve financial disclosure. The Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA) accredits churches that prepare accurate financial statements to be reviewed by an independent certified public accountant and which make their financial statements available upon written request. 
“The LDS Church similarly has the option to make financial disclosure, whether or not the law demands it. Even without a secular obligation to disclose, the Church might view itself as subject to a divine disclosure mandate,” Brunson writes. “But such a mandate does not explicitly exist in canonized Mormon scripture, and the evidence is strong that Church leaders have never believed they were under such a divine mandate, even at the beginning of the Church.” 

A CLOAK OF SECRECY

The whistleblower complaint alleges that the EPA universe of assets grew by $90 billion between 2009 and 2019 and a large part of that growth came as run-off from tithing income to the church. 
Religion Unplugged reached out to several former employees of EPA to hear their perspective on the firm and their response to allegations raised in the whistleblower complaint. One former employee, speaking on background, said he greatly respected EPA staff and leadership and didn’t believe the firm needed to practice more transparency. Transparency, he said, is “usually for accountability to those who you have a fiduciary duty to. In this case, they are responsible to themselves. They don’t have investors. I understand if it is a mutual fund where people give their own money to manage. They [EPA] don’t have shareholders.”
The whistleblower complaint noted that a former Head of Fixed Income at EPA, Richard B. Willes, in 2011 advocated for transparency. “The longer we wait to disclose the more difficult it will be to defend,” the document quotes him as saying. It quotes another member of the asset allocation team saying, “We’ve got an optics problem here. The lack of distributions sure doesn’t look good.” 
An ex-Mormon thread on the message board Reddit names powerful Utah institutions and calls Ensign Peak Advisors “the big kahuna of them all” and identifies it as “the super secretive investment arm of the church.” The author of the Reddit post describes a meeting he had at EPA in which he was asking for a $100 million investment and said the firm saw that amount as a “drop in the bucket” to them. Religion Unplugged tried to reach the person to learn more. 
Other websites online such as Salamander Society has discussion threads asked LDS tithe payers to contact church headquarters and request financial disclosure of church assets and to obtain any response other than “Sorry, that information is not available.” 
In response to Religion Unplugged’s questions about financial disclosure, the church media relations department sent links to statements on the Church web site. “While the Church chooses not to publish the details of its finances, the Church does provide public information on the financial principles it follows, the financial controls in place to protect Church funds and the source and use of these funds,” according to a frequently asked question section on the LDS Church web site. “The Church also provides all financial information required by law.”
Paul Glader is executive editor of ReligionUnplugged.com and on Twitter @PaulGlader.

Solomon: Latvian Government Flagged "Suspicious" Hunter Biden Payments In 2016

As the U.S. presidential race began roaring to life in 2016, authorities in the former Soviet republic of Latvia flagged a series of “ suspicious” financial transactions to Hunter Biden and other colleagues at a Ukrainian natural gas company and sought Kiev’s help investigating, according to documents and interviews.
The Feb. 18, 2016 alert to Ukraine came from the Latvian prosecutorial agency responsible for investigating money laundering, and it specifically questioned whether Vice President Joe Biden’s younger son and three other officials at Burisma Holdings were the potential beneficiaries of suspect funds.
“The Office for Prevention of Laundering of Proceeds Derived from Criminal Activity … is currently investigating suspicious activity of Burisma Holdings Limited,” the Latvian agency also known as the FIU wrote Ukraine’s financial authorities.
The memo was released to me by the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s Office and confirmed by the Latvian embassy to the United States.
Latvian authorities said they did not get any incriminating information back from Ukraine to warrant further investigation and did not take additional action in 2016.
But the memo adds to the mounting evidence that there was ongoing investigative activity surrounding Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden’s compensation as a board member in the weeks just before Joe Biden forced the firing of the Ukraine prosecutor overseeing the Burisma investigation in spring 2016.
The Latvian law enforcement memo identified a series of loan payments totaling about $16.6 million that were routed from companies in Beliz and the United Kingdom to Burisma through Ukraine’s PrivatBank between 2012 and 2015.
The flagged funds were “partially transferred” to Hunter Biden, a board member at Burisma since May 2014, and three other officials working for the Ukrainian natural gas company, the Latvian memo said.
The letter asked Ukrainian officials for any evidence about whether the funds were involved in corruption and whether Ukrainian officials were investigating Burisma and the recipients of the money.
“On the grounds of possible legalization of proceeds derived from criminal activity and corruption, please grant us permission to share the information included in the reply to this request with Latvian law enforcement entities for intelligence purposes only,” the letter said.
Arturs Saburovs, the Third Secretary at the Latvian embassy in Washington, confirmed his country flagged the transactions in February 2016 after seeing public reports that Burisma was under investigation in Ukraine and that Hunter Biden served on the company’s board. He said Latvia did not receive any evidence back from Ukraine to further its investigation.
“The Latvian FIU (Financial Intelligence Unit) is the institution which receives, processes, and analyses reports on banking transactions as well as conducts information exchange with foreign FIUs,” he explained. “If a matter comes to public attention as it did here, the FIU processes that information.
“In this case, the Latvian FIU reached out to its Ukrainian counterpart seeking additional clarifications,” he added. “Information was received, yet no incriminatory evidence for further analysis was provided by the Ukrainian authorities.”
Saburovs said authorities in his country could find no evidence they flagged the same transactions to U.S. authorities even though Hunter Biden and two others named in the letter were Americans and the U.S. firm, Rosemont Seneca Bohais that was connected to Hunter Biden, routinely received monthly payments totaling more than $166,600 from Burisma.
“We do not possess such information,” he said when asked about contacts with U.S. officials.
A lawyer for Hunter Biden and Joe Biden’s campaign did not respond to requests Monday seeking comment.
The Latvian correspondence adds to a growing body of evidence that questions and investigations of Burisma were swirling in early 2016 just before Joe Biden used his authority as vice president to force the firing of Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin in March 2016 by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid.
Shokin was overseeing a wide-ranging Ukrainian investigation of Burisma and has said he was making plans to interview Hunter Biden when he was fired by Ukraine’s president and parliament in March 2016 under pressure from Joe Biden.
Biden and his defenders have said he forced the firing of Shokin because the Ukraine prosecutor was an ineffective corruption fighter; Shokin alleges he was dismissed because he wouldn’t end the Burisma probe.
The Biden family has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, with Jill Biden offering the latest defense of her son this past weekend. “I know my son. I know my son’s character. Hunter did nothing wrong. And that’s the bottom line,” she told MSNBC.
But recently, multiple State Department witnesses testified during the impeachment hearings against President Trump that Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma while his father oversaw U.S.-Ukraine policy as vice president created the appearance of a conflict of interest. One testified e even blocked a project with Burisma because State was concerned about allegations of corruption.
When I first divulged Joe Biden’s role in Shokin’s firing last year, Democrats and their allies in the media and Ukrainian civil society organizations claimed it was no big deal because the Burisma investigation in Ukraine was dormant at the time Biden took action.
But since that time, significant evidence has emerged that the investigation was, in fact, active and that Burisma itself had concerns about the corruption allegations swirling around it.
For instance, Ukrainian prosecutors confirmed in December 2015 they transferred their investigative files to detectives at the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine to pursue several leads.
On Feb. 2, 2016, the Ukraine prosecutor general’s office secured a court order to re-seize the assets of Burisma Holdings founder Mykola Zlochevsky. Officers went to the home, placed seizure notices and took items from the home that included a luxury car, officials said.
About two weeks later, the Latvian suspicious financial transactions memo was transmitted to Ukrainian authorities.
And then in late February, according to U.S. documents recently released under the Freedom of Information Act, Burisma’s American representatives pressed the U.S. State Department to try to help end the corruption allegations against the company. You can read those documents here.
By mid-March 2016, State’s top official for Ukraine policy publicly called for Shokin’s ouster, and less than three weeks later Joe Biden managed to force Ukraine’s president to fire Shokin by threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees.
Almost immediately, Burisma’s American legal team was in Ukraine seeking to meet with Shokin’s replacement at the Ukraine prosecutor general’s office.
summary of an April 6, 2016 meeting between Burisma representatives and Ukraine prosecutors – released by the Prosecutor General’s Office – states “false information” was used to justify Shokin’s firing.
Whatever the case, the corruption investigations were dropped in late 2016 and early 2017, and Burisma paid a penalty for tax issues.
But early in 2019, NABU and the Ukraine prosecutor general’s office announced they were reopening the investigation into Burisma, specifically to revisit the allegations about money laundering, according to the notice of suspicion released by prosecutors in that country. You can read NABU’s request to reopen the probe here.
That probe is ongoing and recently was expanded to look at other issues. And the entire Burisma episode is now part of the larger impeachment proceedings playing out in America against President Donald Trump.